Search…⌘K

Is there
scientific consensus?

An open repository of scientific consensus for non‑experts.

Press / to search · or browse 11 disciplines below
247consensus pages
1,832citations
11disciplines
18open questions

Browse by discipline

11 active subject areas, tagged on every entry.

How it works

Every score is reproducible from its citations. No black box.
01 · Submit

Anyone can ask a question.

Public submissions go through editorial review. Approved questions become open drafts that ORCID-verified contributors populate with citations.

02 · Cite

Every citation is weighted by study quality.

Each citation carries a stance (supports / mixed / refutes) and an evidence mass mᵢ, guided by study design. Higher tiers count for more.

Systematic review / meta-analysis1.0
RCT or large prospective cohort0.7
Observational / ecological0.4
Case report / opinion / gray literature0.2
03 · Score

The consensus score is reproducible.

Computed from the citations by one formula applied uniformly across the repository — no per-entry hand-tuning.

Cₚ = 50 + 50 · Xₚ · tanh(Mₚ / W₀)

where Xₚ is the center of mass (directional support, −1…+1), Mₚ is the time-decayed evidence mass Σ mᵢ·e^(−tᵢ/T), and W₀ is a per-discipline calibration constant.

Recent activity

The repository is a living record — scores shift as evidence accumulates.

Have a question we should answer?

If a claim isn’t yet in the repository, submit it. Approved questions become open drafts that qualified contributors populate with citations and expert review.

Submit a question →