Search…⌘K

Do minimum-wage increases reduce employment?

Summary

The literature is genuinely divided. Quasi-experimental studies since the 1990s find small, context-dependent effects in both directions, and reasonable economists disagree on their size and sign. This is a well-evidenced stalemate, not an absence of evidence.

Weighted evidence distribution5 citations · 18.7 weighted mass
34.7%Supports(6.5)26.4%Mixed(4.9)38.8%Refutes(7.3)
Consensus score?48/100
Evidence mass · Mₚ?18.7
Center of mass · Xₚ?−0.04
Calibration · W₀?18

Claim

Moderate minimum-wage increases reduce employment among low-wage workers.

Answer

Foundational natural-experiment work found no measurable disemployment from a moderate increase Card 1994, and later bunching-estimator designs reach similar conclusions Cengiz 2019. Other careful studies find the opposite — modest negative effects on employment or hours Neumark 2008, Meer 2016.

A recent systematic review concludes the effect is small and highly context-dependent, varying with the bite of the increase and local labour-market conditions Dube 2019. The weighted evidence sits near the midpoint: substantial mass on both sides, little net lean.

Consensus score

The score is computed deterministically from the citations below, following the methodology in the manuscript (§5). Nothing is hand-tuned per entry — change the evidence and the number moves.

Cₚ = 50 + 50 · Xₚ · tanh(Mₚ / W₀)
= 50 + 50 · (-0.041) · tanh(18.67 / 18)
= 50 + 50 · (-0.041) · 0.777
= 48.4 / 100
48.4
Cₚ
Consensus score
−0.041
Xₚ
Center of mass
18.67
Mₚ
Decayed evidence mass
18
W₀
Calibration · Economics
20 yr
T
Decay time
0.777
tanh(Mₚ/W₀)
Evidence sufficiency
5
n
Citations
36.0
Σmᵢ
Raw mass (undecayed)
Citationsᵢmᵢtᵢe^(−tᵢ/T)mᵢ·e^(−tᵢ/T)sᵢ·mᵢ·e^(−tᵢ/T)
Card 1994−18.032y0.2021.621.62
Cengiz 2019−18.07y0.7055.645.64
Neumark 2008+17.018y0.4072.85+2.85
Meer 2016+16.010y0.6073.64+3.64
Dube 201907.07y0.7054.93+0.00
Σ over citations36.018.67
Mₚ
−0.77
Xₚ·Mₚ

Reading it: the verdict is Mixed evidence. Direction comes only from Xₚ (tanh is always positive); certainty comes from tanh(Mₚ/W₀) = 0.78. Because Cₚ = 50 when Xₚ = 0 regardless of mass, a balanced stalemate and an unstudied question both read as 50 — which is why Mₚ is always shown alongside the score.

Citations · 5

Sort
RefutesQuasi-experimental

The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs

Cengiz et al. · 2019 · Quarterly Journal of Economics · 10.1093/qje/qjz014
BunchingN=138 events
Bunching estimator across 138 state-level increases finds minimal employment loss in the affected wage range.
Mass mᵢ8.0
2019 · ×0.70
SupportsObservational

Effects of the minimum wage on employment dynamics

Meer & West · 2016 · Journal of Human Resources · 10.3368/jhr.51.2.0414-6298R1
DynamicsNegative effect
Argues effects appear in employment growth rather than levels, finding negative dynamic effects.
Mass mᵢ6.0
2016 · ×0.61
SupportsMeta-analysis

Minimum Wages

Neumark & Wascher · 2008 · MIT Press · 10.7551/mitpress/9780262141024.001.0001
ReviewNegative effect
Reviews a large body of work and concludes the preponderance points to modest negative employment effects.
Mass mᵢ7.0
2008 · ×0.41

References

Generated automatically from citations.Export · BibTeX · RIS · JSON-LD

Provenance

Created by
@a_young · 24 Apr 2026
Last revised by
@a_young · 19 May 2026
Reviewed by
2 expert reviewers
Contributing editors
7 editors

Score changelog

Generated from citation evidence
RevisionScore CₚMass MₚCenter Xₚ
Current revision4818.70.04
19 May 202648118.70.04
24 Apr 20264916.20.02

Metadata

Claim type
Empirical · Causal
Evidence base
Quasi-experimental + Observational
Subject area
Economics · Labour

Limitations

How to read this score
This score is not a statement of final truth or a policy recommendation. Stance and mass are researcher-assigned, citation dependence is not modeled, and scores are not directly comparable across disciplines without re-calibrating W₀ and the quality tiers. It reflects weighted, recency-discounted evidence convergence at the time of last revision.