Search…⌘K
Frozen snapshot · version 1. This immutable record never changes — it is what the DOI and academic citations resolve to.Go to living entry →

Do childhood vaccines cause autism?

Summary

The weighted evidence overwhelmingly refutes this claim. Large, independent population studies across multiple countries find no association between childhood vaccination and autism; the original study suggesting a link was retracted for fraud.

Weighted evidence distribution5 citations · 19.9 weighted mass
1.6%Supports(0.3)0.0%Mixed(0.0)98.4%Refutes(19.6)
Consensus score?8/100
Evidence mass · Mₚ?19.9
Center of mass · Xₚ?−0.97
Calibration · W₀?15

Claim

Routine childhood vaccination with currently licensed schedules (including MMR) causes autism spectrum disorder at the population level.

Answer

No credible peer-reviewed evidence supports a causal link between childhood vaccination and autism. Nationwide cohort studies following hundreds of thousands of children find no increased risk Hviid 2019, and a meta-analysis spanning more than 1.2 million children reaches the same conclusion Taylor 2014.

The claim originates with a 1998 case series Wakefield 1998 that was retracted after its data were found to be falsified and its author lost his medical license. It is retained here with minimal weight purely to document the origin of the controversy. The persistent public debate is a memetic phenomenon, not a scientific one.

Consensus score

The score is computed deterministically from the citations below, following the methodology in the manuscript (§5). Nothing is hand-tuned per entry — change the evidence and the number moves.

Cₚ = 50 + 50 · Xₚ · tanh(Mₚ / W₀)
= 50 + 50 · (-0.967) · tanh(19.95 / 15)
= 50 + 50 · (-0.967) · 0.869
= 8.0 / 100
8.0
Cₚ
Consensus score
−0.967
Xₚ
Center of mass
19.95
Mₚ
Decayed evidence mass
15
W₀
Calibration · Medicine
25 yr
T
Decay time
0.869
tanh(Mₚ/W₀)
Evidence sufficiency
5
n
Citations
34.0
Σmᵢ
Raw mass (undecayed)
Citationsᵢmᵢtᵢe^(−tᵢ/T)mᵢ·e^(−tᵢ/T)sᵢ·mᵢ·e^(−tᵢ/T)
Taylor 2014−110.012y0.6196.196.19
Hviid 2019−19.07y0.7566.806.80
Madsen 2002−18.024y0.3833.063.06
DeStefano 2013−16.013y0.5953.573.57
Wakefield 1998+11.028y0.3260.33+0.33
Σ over citations34.019.95
Mₚ
−19.29
Xₚ·Mₚ

Reading it: the verdict is Strong scientific consensus · No. Direction comes only from Xₚ (tanh is always positive); certainty comes from tanh(Mₚ/W₀) = 0.87. Because Cₚ = 50 when Xₚ = 0 regardless of mass, a balanced stalemate and an unstudied question both read as 50 — which is why Mₚ is always shown alongside the score.

Citations · 5

Sort

References

Generated automatically from citations.Export · BibTeX · RIS · JSON-LD

Provenance

Created by
@a_young · 2 Mar 2026
Last revised by
@rcampbell · 14 May 2026
Reviewed by
4 expert reviewers
Contributing editors
21 editors

Score changelog

Generated from citation evidence
RevisionScore CₚMass MₚCenter Xₚ
Current revision819.90.97
14 May 20268119.50.96
20 Mar 20269218.10.95
2 Mar 20261115.90.94

Metadata

Claim type
Empirical · Causal
Evidence base
Epidemiological cohorts + Meta-analysis
Subject area
Medicine · Vaccine safety

Limitations

How to read this score
This score is not a statement of final truth or a policy recommendation. Stance and mass are researcher-assigned, citation dependence is not modeled, and scores are not directly comparable across disciplines without re-calibrating W₀ and the quality tiers. It reflects weighted, recency-discounted evidence convergence at the time of last revision.